Navigation Top
AGO Logo Graphic
AGO Header Image
File a Complaint
Contact the AGO
AGO Opinions with Topic: ABORTIONS
AGO 1971 No. 4 >  January 20, 1971
MINORS - GUARDIANS - ABORTIONS
PARENTAL CONSENT TO TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY OF MINOR CHILD The pregnancy of an unmarried female under 18 years of age may be terminated in accordance with chapter 3, Laws of 1970 (Referendum No. 20), if all other conditions set forth therein are met, on the basis of her own consent and that of her parent as her legal guardian, unless some other person has been appointed by the court to serve as her legal guardian.
AGO 1971 No. 15 >  April 26, 1971
ABORTIONS - MARRIAGE - RESIDENCE
NECESSITY FOR CONSENT BY HUSBAND TO TERMINATION OF MARRIED WOMAN'S PREGNANCY (1) A married woman does not have to be physically residing in the same place of abode as her husband at the time of termination of her pregnancy under RCW 9.02.070 in order for his consent thereto to be required.(2) A married woman should be regarded as "residing" with her husband to the extent that his consent to a termination of her pregnancy under RCW 9.02.070 is required, where the only reason for his absence from her place of abode is his employment; e.g., military or civil service overseas.(3) If a married couple is living separate and apart either because of the husband's desertion or some other breakdown of the marital relationship, the husband's consent to the termination of his wife's pregnancy under RCW 9.02.070 is not required even though no legal separation (e.g., decree of separate maintenance under RCW 26.08.120) has been granted.
AGO 1971 No. 26 >  August 18, 1971
ABORTIONS
ABORTIONS Neither chapter 3, Laws of 1970 (Referendum No. 20), nor any other law or regulation currently in effect, allows a pregnancy of a woman to be terminated by any person other than a physician licensed under either chapter 18.71 RCW or chapter 18.57 RCW, or by the pregnant woman herself when following the directions of a physician so licensed.
AGO 2004 No. 1 >  January 5, 2004
ABORTIONS - PHYSICIANS - NURSES - PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Authority of Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioners (ARNPs) to prescribe or furnish abortion-inducing drugs, without any supervision from a licensed physician, to women seeking lawful abortions An Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner may, when consistent with his or her professional license, lawfully furnish or prescribe a drug to a woman for the purpose of inducing an abortion where the drug may lawfully be prescribed and the woman seeks to terminate her pregnancy before the fetus is viable or for the purpose of preserving the woman’s life or health
AGO 1973 No. 7 >  February 14, 1973
ABORTIONS - RESIDENCY - CONSENT - TIME PERIOD - LICENSED PHYSICIAN - APPROVED HOSPITAL - IMPACT OF UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON ENFORCEABILITY OF WASHINGTON ABORTION LAWS
IMPACT OF UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON ENFORCEABILITY OF WASHINGTON ABORTION LAWS a
AGO 1989 No. 16 >  August 25, 1989
ABORTIONS - PREGNANCY - PHYSICIANS - CRIMES
Effects of Webster v. Reproductive Health Services on Washington laws. 1.RCW 9.02.010 is still unenforceable insofar as it purports, in conjunction with RCW 9.02.060 et seq., to prohibit abortions occurring more than four lunar months after conception but prior to viability.2.Webster v. Reproductive Health Servs., 57 U.S.L.W. 5023 (1989) does not overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 35 L. Ed. 2d 147, 93 S. Ct. 705 (1973); the effect of Webster is to uphold provisions of Missouri statutes which have no counterparts in Washington statute; thus Roe still renders most of Washington's abortion statute (RCW 9.02.010 through .090) unenforceable.3.The conclusions reached in AGO 1973 No. 7, that Roe rendered several of Washington's abortion provisions unenforceable, remain valid after Webster v. Reproductive Health Servs., 57 U.S.L.W. 5023 (1989); we decline to speculate about the future direction of case law on abortion.4.There is no current law in Washington prohibiting the use of public funds for abortions; Webster v. Reproductive Health Servs., 57 U.S.L.W. 5023 (1989) does not change Washington law in this regard.
AGLO 1982 No. 13 >  May 20, 1982
OFFICES AND OFFICERS - STATE - BOARD OF HEALTH - ABORTIONS - ACCREDITED HOSPITAL
PERFORMANCE OF ABORTIONS IN OTHER APPROVED MEDICAL FACILITIES The State Board of Health, acting pursuant to RCW 9.02.070, may sanction the performance of second trimester abortions in medical facilities other than an accredited hospital where such medical facilities meet standards prescribed by regulations issued by the Board for the safe and adequate care and treatment of patients.
AGLO 1976 No. 46 >  July 27, 1976
ABORTIONS - PARENTAL OR SPOUSAL CONSENT
IMPACT OF RECENT SUPREME COURT DECISIONS In view of decisions rendered by the United States Supreme Court in Parenthood of Central Missouri, et al. v. Danforth, 44 L.W. 5197 and Bellotti, et al. v. Baird, et al., 44 L.W. 5221 (1976), neither the parental or spousal consent requirements of RCW 9.02.070, regulating abortions, are currently constitutionally unenforceable.
AGLO 1975 No. 71 >  August 13, 1975
ABORTIONS - CONSENT OF HUSBAND - PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC HOSPITAL HOSPITAL
DEATH CERTIFICATES (1) The requirement of RCW 9.02.070 that an abortion, in order to be noncriminal, be performed upon a married woman only with the consent of her husband, remains presumptively constitutional in the absence of a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court or the Washington supreme court to the contrary. (2) RCW 9.02.080, which permits a hospital to refuse to allow its facilities to be used in the performance of an abortion, remains presumptively constitutional even as to public hospitals in the absence of a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court or the Washington supreme court to the contrary. (3) A hospital may require that prior to an abortion where the fetus is believed to be in excess of 20 weeks, that an attending physician consult with another physician to determine that the pregnancy has not gone beyond the 28th week or second trimester.
Content Bottom Graphic
AGO Logo