<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><description>AGO Opinions</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinions.aspx</link><title>AGO Opinions</title><item><title>AGO 2012 No. 3</title><description>&lt;b&gt;TAX TITLE LAND - TAXATION - LEINS-Deferral Of Property Taxes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The lien in favor of the state for payment of deferred property taxes and special assessments created under RCW 84.38.100 is canceled when a county acquires title to the property through foreclosure for delinquent taxes.  Where the county later sells such property, sales proceeds are apportioned pursuant to RCW 36.35.110.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=29660</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=29660</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2012 No. 1</title><description>&lt;b&gt;CITIES - LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION - PREEMPTION-Whether State Law Requiring Food Establishments To Accommodate Trained Guide Dogs And Miniature Horses Preempts An Ordinance Of A First Class City Requiring Accommodation Of A Broader Class Of Animals&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;An ordinance of a first class city that prohibits food establishments from treating people differently based upon the use of additional types of service animals is not preempted by a state law prohibiting different treatment based only on the use of trained guide dogs and miniature horses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=29434</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=29434</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2012 No. 2</title><description>&lt;b&gt;HEALTH - TRANSIENT ACCOMODATIONS-Inspection Of Occupied Hotel And Motel Rooms&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Department of Health is precluded by statute from inspecting occupied rooms when conducting inspections of transient accommodations, without regard to presence or consent of the occupant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=29438</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=29438</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2011 No. 2</title><description>&lt;b&gt;COUNTIES - CITIES - DISTRICTS - INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT - BIDS-Requirement That Local Agencies Comply With Procurement Procedures For Architectural And Engineering Services&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cities, counties, and special districts cannot contract directly with another agency for architectural and engineering services without first complying with the procurement procedures set forth in RCW 39.80, except where the legislature has granted specific statutory authority to do so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=28930</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=28930</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2011 No. 1</title><description>&lt;b&gt;TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS - SCHOOL PROPERTY - FINES-Application Of Statute Doubling Monetary Penalty For Speeding In A School Or Playground Speed Zone&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;RCW 46.61.440(3), which requires doubling the monetary penalties in a school or play-ground speed zone, applies to infractions committed in violation of both RCW 46.61.440(1) and RCW 46.61.440(2).&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=28906</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=28906</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 10</title><description>&lt;b&gt;COUNTIES - COUNTY TREASURERS - MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS - TAXES - INTEREST-Sweeping Interest And Investment Returns Into County Current Expense Fund&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;RCW 36.29.020 allows a county treasurer to allocate the interest and investment returns earned on the investment of a county’s own funds into the county current expense fund, except for county funds as to which the legislature has specifically provided that interest and investment returns are to be dedicated to a specific purpose, or be retained in their original fund.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=27026</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=27026</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 9</title><description>&lt;b&gt;OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT-Meetings Of Committee Attended By Other Members Of Governing Body&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Open Public Meetings Act requires that notice be properly given of a meeting of the governing body.  This requirement is not satisfied by notice given for a meeting of a standing committee of a city council as a governing body, where a quorum of members of the city council attend the meeting and take action as defined in the act, such that a meeting of the city council as a governing body takes place.</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=26916</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=26916</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 8</title><description>&lt;b&gt;PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT - EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES - CITIES AND COUNTIES-Whether A Property Tax Assessment Levied By A City Divided Between Two Counties Must Be Reduced Based Upon A Property Tax Levy Imposed By One County But Not The Other&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;If a city divided between two counties imposes a property tax levy to pay for emergency medical services, and one of the counties imposes its own levy for the same purpose, but the other county does not, RCW 84.52.069 does not require the city to reduce its property tax levy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=26808</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=26808</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 7</title><description>&lt;b&gt;MINIMUM WAGE-Annual Adjustment Of Minimum Wage Following Decrease In Cost Of Living&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Initiative 688 requires the Department of Labor and Industries to hold the minimum wage steady in years following a decline in the cost of living, until the cost of living returns to its previous peak.  Thereafter, the Department of Labor and Industries is required to increase the minimum wage as the cost of living increases, but the law does not permit the minimum wage to decrease when the cost of living declines.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=26444</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=26444</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 6</title><description>&lt;b&gt;WAGES - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES-Application Of Wage Payment Act To Employees Of State And Local Governmental Agencies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Wage Payment Act applies to complaints by state and local public employees.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=26398</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=26398</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 5</title><description>&lt;b&gt;TAXATION - TAX LEVIES - TIMBER - TREASURER-Distribution Of Timber Excise Tax Revenues&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;When county timber excise tax revenues received during the third and fourth quarters of a year are insufficient to fully satisfy the first and second priorities for revenue distribution under RCW 84.33.081(2) and (4), distributions made to lower-priority districts during the first and second quarters of that year may not be taken back and redistributed to first- or second-priority districts.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;School district property tax rates may not be adjusted during a tax year when timber excise tax revenues fall short of projections used in calculating the tax rate and levying property taxes for the year.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25998</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25998</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 4</title><description>&lt;b&gt;COURTS, SUPERIOR - COUNTIES - LEGISLATURE-Authority Of County Legislative Authority To Eliminate A Superior Court Position Upon Occurrence Of A Vacancy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The state constitution vests authority in the legislature to direct the number of judges of the superior court.  A county legislative authority wishing to reduce the number of existing judgeships may work with the legislature to accomplish that result.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25148</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25148</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 3</title><description>&lt;b&gt;GAMBLING - CHARITY - STATE EMPLOYEES - ETHICS IN PUBLIC SERVICE ACT-Raffles Conducted By State Employees For Charitable Or Benevolent Entity&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;1.         RCW 9.46.0209 authorizes state employees to conduct charitable raffles, but such raffles may benefit a person or family in need through a qualified charitable or benevolent entity.  However, state employees may not conduct a raffle for the purpose of raising funds that will be transmitted directly to an individual person or family in need.  2.         A charitable raffle conducted by a group of state employees may benefit a family, family member, or friend of a state employee conducting the raffle, only if that recipient has been designated as a person or family in need by a qualified charitable or benevolent entity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25116</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25116</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 2</title><description>&lt;b&gt;OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS-Scope Of Practice Of Occupational Therapy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The scope of practice for occupational therapists does not include the practice of sharp debridement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25056</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25056</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AGO 2010 No. 1</title><description>&lt;b&gt;LAW ENFORCEMENT - LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES-Use Of Asset Forfeiture Funds For Accreditation And Reaccreditation Of Law Enforcement Agencies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law enforcement agencies can use the net proceeds of asset forfeitures under RCW 10.105.010 for accreditation, reaccreditation, and necessary associated training which serves to improve law enforcement activity, provided that such funding does not supplant existing funding sources.  However, assets forfeited pursuant to other statutes for which the use of funds is more tightly restricted can only be used for accreditation and training  purposes, if the subject matter is closely related to the purposes of the applicable forfeiture statute.</description><link>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25006</link><guid>http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?id=25006</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
