Other LanguagesWe are in receipt of your recent letter requesting our opinion ". . . as to whether a Board of School Directors may conduct a hearing with respect to expelling a child from school in executive session, under terms of the 1971 open meeting act."
This is written in response to your recent letter requesting our opinion on certain questions relating to reported current employment policies pertaining to fire fighters employed by the city of Anacortes.
In our telephone conversation, followed by your letter dated January 6, 1971, you have asked for our views on the following questions:
I have been asked to reply to your letter of January 15, 1970, regarding the publication of proposed revisions to zoning plans.
This is written in response to your recent letter requesting our opinion with regard to the constitutional validity of House Bill No. 15, a measure currently pending before the legislature which proposes to establish a state‑operated sweepstakes.
"(1) If a public utility district commission by resolution appoints and hires an auditor, . . . is that auditor the employee of the board of district commissioners, or is the auditor and are the auditor's functions, subject to the supervision and control of the manager?
This is written in response to your recent letter requesting our opinion on the question pertaining to the eligibility of a certain individual for an exemption from the first fifty dollars in real property taxation pursuant to RCW 84.36.128.
This is written in response to your recent request for our opinion on several questions pertaining to the availability of revenues derived from state excise taxes on the sale of cigarettes to fund the payment of bonuses to the veterans of the current conflict in Viet Nam, as contemplated by a bill (House Bill No. 9) which is currently pending before the legislature. Reading your request with the provisions of this bill in mind, we may paraphrase the questions raised by your request as follows:
This is written in response to your recent letter requesting our opinion on two questions relating to the property tax status of some 22,000 parcels of real property located in King county. Based upon the recent decision of the Washington Supreme Court in Dore v. Kinnear, 79 W.D. 755 (October 14, 1971) [[79 Wn.2d 755]], holding certain 1970 appraisals of other taxable property in King county to be unconstitutional in so far as they were utilized for 1971 property taxes, you have asked:
By letter previously acknowledged your predecessor in office requested our opinion as to whether a deferred sentence can be granted upon a second conviction for drunk driving in view of the provisions of RCW 46.61.515.1/ Thereafter, upon your assumption of office, we wrote to you inquiring as to whether you were desirous of receiving our opinion on this question. By letter dated January 21, 1971, your responded in the affirmative.